Semiology of Political Security of Under-Transfer Iran The nesessary setting for “soliderity in the local structure

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch

2 Full Professor, Tehran University

3 Associate Professor, Holy War Science and Knowledge Research Center

Abstract

Establishing security in Iran is considered as strategic action necessities. Security
can be considerde as “ strategic action shortfall” of many Middle East countries.
Iran is also considered as one of the political entities which through 1970s,
has always suffered from the challenge of instability and security shortfall.
Under such conditions, it is necessary to pay attention to the mechanisms of
establishing security in Iran. Moreover, conceptual security includes several
impressive variables in the field of social and internal and regional policies.
Each of the political security indexes is important because it creates “soliderity
in the internal structure”. Countries which have unity, soliderity and empathy in
their internal domain, are entitled to have stronger approach and supposition for
national authority. Any poliotical authority can be considerd as part of a social
action equation which leads to social soliderity and their accompaniment with
the priorities of political structure.The main question of this article is what is the “semiology of political security
in under-transfer Iran and how it can be achieved?” The hypothesis of this
article points to the issue that “semiology of political security in under-transfer
Iran” will be achieved through the mechanisms relevant to unity, partnership,
authority, social influence, efficiency and efficacy in the process of social crises.
In the course of preparing this article, post holy war data analysis and social
objectivity methodology were utilized.

Keywords